새 스레드 작성 응답 확인
|<< 최신 2019-09-28 20:37 가장 오래된 >>|
--- We are DOOMED it is the end < GentleManOfClass > 링크
: . . Original article, fortunately it's open access < HoneyBadger > 링크
: . . 100 volts per meter of height? < oldgas > -1
: . . : . . How do you propose insulating it < - >
: . . : . . : . . if its going to drain, then its going to drain < oldgas >
: . . : . . : . . : . . voltage ≠ charge § < - >
: . . : . . : . . : . . 20 to 25 thousand volts off the fingertips.... < - > 링크
: . . : . . I could believe 100 volts per kilometer § < crippled >
--- Four stationery puzzles < crotalus > 링크
--- What's wrong with playing YAHTZEE w/ squirrels? < - > -5+10 사진
: . . Damn, last turn, needed a straight! < - > +3 사진
: . . Sorry you're late. It's a scientific fact that § < summer_ended_on-9-23-19 >
: . . : . . Really? And if I'm posting from Australia ...? § < - >
: . . : . . : . . It's always Summer Down Under! § < Henry_Blythe >
: . . : . . : . . : . . New level of ignorant for you, Hank § < - >
: . . Squirrels always win. < - >
--- People talk about colonizing the moon or Mars < Help-me-nerds > -1+3
: . . If we had poured the billions we've spent in < ByronHenry > -13
: . . : . . Yes, we'd have a front row seat < - > -8
: . . : . . No we wouldn't. < --- > +8
: . . That's not the reason < - > -3
: . . : . . No, they colonized for riches. § < northcoaster >
: . . : . . Ah, the "B-ship" approach... § < pwt >
: . . Why not do both, and as a species? < - > -5
: . . : . . LOL! have you looked a who runs the world?? < northcoaster >
: . . : . . : . . ^^ Trump in CL § < Witchgrl > -5
: . . : . . : . . : . . No. History. § < northcoaster >
: . . Resources is the key < - >
: . . : . . Most of that is SIFI at best. § < Witchgrl > -1+7
: . . Yes, in other words, Terraform the earth to fix < RobertReport > -1+5
: . . The Solar System is doomed. < - > +1
: . . Absofuckinglutely! I vote for you for Emporer of < northcoaster > -3+5
: . . The longer oraganisms evolve and become < VeronicasPhantom > -3
: . . : . . The Earth is ultimately doomed < - >
: . . : . . : . . We have the perfect place to practice, the < VeronicasPhantom >
--- Progress on carbon sequestration from Iceland < HoneyBadger > 링크
: . . The worldwide carbon budget is massive < Deniersockpuppet > -13+5
: . . : . . 1930s climate refugees???? < RogerInHawaii > -10+2
: . . : . . : . . Citation < - > 링크
: . . Better to break it down to C and O2 < northcoaster >
: . . : . . Disassociating CO2 into C + O2 < tarragon_man > +3
hnl Where's Waldo, ummm, I mean, Vikram < RogerInHawaii > 링크
: . . I thought they (India) said they'd seen it? § < Barleycorn >
: . . : . . I recall that as well < RogerInHawaii >
: . . : . . : . . I saw a couple of anomalous bright spots, but < Barleycorn >
: . . Under 10 feet of lunar regolith < Modi_is_Hindu_Hitler >
: . . October's not too far away. I looked for ISRO < Henry_Blythe > 링크
--- Astrophysicists: gamma-ray jets exceed the speed < of-light! > -39+3
: . . The rest of the story... < -Pauline-Harbey- > -2+8
: . . : . . So, it's like Cherenkov radiation... < invivoVibrio > -2+7
: . . A little more detail < yetanothertroll > -5+8 링크
: . . So where's the proof of that hypothesis? § < northcoaster > -6+6
: . . : . . Apparently the "proof" is that their model < NewMsLoree > -5
: . . : . . : . . it's a hypothesis and no more valid than < - > -5
: . . : . . : . . : . . I feel dumber for having read that. < NewMsLoree > -5
: . . : . . : . . Once again, no proof. § < northcoaster >
: . . What is a "jet medium"? § < linux_coder > -1+3
: . . : . . It's a a science thing, you probably won't < Understand-it > -3 사진
: . . : . . : . . So it's straight out of Compton. Got it! § < - > -3+4
: . . : . . : . . : . . How could you neg me for a great pun like that? § < - >
: . . : . . A Boeing 707? < Glibbons >
: . . Wow, all of the anti-science got hard negging < this-post > -31
: . . : . . Well, it might help if you actually linked your § < source-on-this___ > +2
: . . : . . : . . ...and included more than just half the < --o-- > +2
: . . : . . : . . : . . The first poster had already mentioned < - >
: . . Read that 20 years ago; explained then too § < - > -1
: . . I don't believe a word of it. I suspect their < RobertReport > -2+10
: . . MY BAD! Forgot link; swore I pasted it in. < of-light! > -5 링크
: . . That's stupid, because < - > -5
--- Is a belter Crest the same as a mohawk? § < noizy > -6
: . . That's my understanding of it. § < Glibbons > -5
--- A shepherd asked a mathematician to help him < Deniersockpuppet > +12
: . . Speaking of which ... < - >
: . . : . . Yes but where is the missing dollar? § < - > +2
: . . : . . : . . The sailors snorted coke with it § < dogmantra >
: . . : . . Neat how 1/2 + 1/3 + 1/9=(9 + 6 + 2)/18 = 17/18. § < Leo_J4 >
: . . : . . They divided up the cows when Monica added a < RobertReport >
: . . : . . : . . Well unless you're willing < - >
: . . : . . : . . Well, I know what you mean, but < pwt > -1
: . . : . . Monika not bright < - > -2
: . . : . . : . . Typical con garbage... < - > -5
: . . : . . Invalid solution < Glibbons >
: . . Make a bunch of hamburger , problem solved § < dogmantra > -2
: . . 37 is already a round number § < - >
--- Three phase power < tarragon_man >
: . . Well, < - > 링크
: . . No. Would not work. < DreadPirateRobertz > -1+10
: . . : . . Now I see. < tarragon_man >
: . . Nope! A single phase transformer < RobertReport >
: . . : . . Now think carefully about what you said < - > -5
: . . : . . : . . ummmmm....no. < DreadPirateRobertz > -5+10
: . . : . . : . . : . . No! I don't trust you, you are wrong! < - > -8 사진
: . . : . . : . . : . . : . . Your pic is of a single phase generator < DreadPirateRobertz > -5+5 링크
: . . : . . : . . : . . : . . He's right, you're wrong < AZ_Dude > -5+15
: . . : . . : . . : . . : . . No. Normal house current, < pwt > -2
: . . : . . : . . Two phase is not "Polyphase" In sort, < RobertReport > -2
: . . You can take the outputs from an alternator < RadonHufffer >
: . . There are several companies < BHLoop >
: . . Yes, at microwave frequencies < How_Green_Is_That >
: . . There's many such devices, they use a rotor < - > +5
--- Related to the voltage regulator question below. < GoodThingsEndure >
: . . So there is a differentiation in terms. < - >
: . . What's that grey connector on my alternator? § < single-element >
: . . In the inverter I suggested above for converting < RobertReport >
: . . : . . The advertising makes the most < GoodThingsEndure >
: . . An inverter inverts! < uoip > -2+10
: . . : . . That's what I've been looking for. Now < GoodThingsEndure >
: . . : . . : . . Yes, that is how it is done. < aikixtal > +5 링크
: . . : . . : . . There are lots of ways to get the same results < AZ_Dude >
--- Hypothetical orbital rail gun... < Glibbons > -5
: . . You don't need a rail gun for earth surface < NewMsLoree > -1
: . . : . . A true "rod from god" isn't dropped from V = 0 < invivoVibrio > 링크
: . . : . . : . . Don't be so literal... < NewMsLoree > -15
: . . : . . : . . : . . I'm not trying to be a pedant, < invivoVibrio >
: . . : . . : . . : . . It does not have to be slowed < - >
: . . What happens to the orbiting RAIL GUN < RogerInHawaii > -1
: . . : . . If the programmers are clever, the thrust from < yetanothertroll > -5
: . . : . . : . . Not likely. < RogerInHawaii >
: . . : . . : . . : . . In general I agree with your position, < pwt >
: . . : . . : . . : . . : . . Yes, opposite directions < RogerInHawaii >
: . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . The "lead" term was just a correction to your < pwt >
: . . I'm thinking that the best location < RogerInHawaii >
: . . What does the "rail gun" have to do with it? < Deniersockpuppet > -2+5
: . . The rail gun [mass driver] as delivery mech- < Barleycorn > -5
: . . Would be inaccurate < crotalus > 링크
: . . This might be of ... < zorpoid > 링크
: . . It's illegal no matter what! < - >
: . . : . . I wish that were true, < invivoVibrio > -1 링크
--- What's better than a Tesla on fire? < - > -18+8 링크
: . . I bet U think your Zerohedge article is factual § < dont_you? > -5+5
: . . : . . that one is. the story is in local papers, too. § < - > -5+7
: . . : . . : . . zero wedge just covers what MSM won't touch < manlydan > -8+5 링크
: . . : . . They're an aggregator. They're not the sole < - > -5+5
: . . : . . : . . Yes it is a political artticle < NewMsLoree > -5+5
: . . Your balls in a vice § < - > -5
: . . It's an electric car. < crippled >
: . . hmmm < NewMsLoree > -8+5 링크
: . . : . . Thanks for digging up the original < - > -10
: . . : . . : . . Shut up you stupid liar! < Seriously-just-sthu! >
: . . : . . : . . It's also a fact ZeroHedge has a far right bias < NewMsLoree > -7+14
: . . : . . : . . : . . A credible source would be < DoubleHaul > -5
: . . : . . : . . You want forumID=29, where you can join your < fellow-paranoids-and >
: . . like a supersized version of explodding iPhones < manlydan > -5
: . . Probably because Tesla cars < pwt > 링크
--- What do you call a DC voltage regulator? < Naturaly2_71 >
: . . A DC voltage regulator is Election Day. < ByronHenry > -9+5
: . . Typically they are known as charge controllers < -X-Factor- > +1
: . . : . . hmm ok thank you. So the commercial product < Naturaly2_71 >
: . . : . . : . . I have used something like this < WonderWheeler > 링크
: . . An eco-lobbyist in Washington? § < Glibbons >
: . . The correct name is "voltage regulator" < Frog_Barf >
: . . : . . Alternators require a voltage regulator too. § < tarragon_man >
: . . : . . : . . But internal rather than a discrete device. § < - >
--- Anyone here have any experience with < ByronHenry > -6
: . . Maybe ... < RogerInHawaii >
: . . Looking a bit at it < kozzy > +2 링크
: . . Is that the convoluted mess they came up with < dogmantra > -4
: . . : . . You mean the stupid parents who can't grasp < -- > -15
: . . : . . : . . Right , because #'s keep changing ., ., . < dogmantra > -3+2
: . . : . . : . . Year 1922 wasn't "mindless drones" < - > +10
: . . : . . I noticed that a lot of this is < coelentrate > +7
: . . : . . : . . First you crawl , then you walk , < dogmantra > -4
: . . : . . : . . Yup, rounding, estimating, < aikixtal >
: . . : . . You're not intellectually equipped to be < anything-but-a-victim-so >
: . . : . . : . . Because you're so smart , < dogmantra >
--- If you put this answer on a test < - > -3 사진
: . . Depends. < pwt > -1+2
: . . I would answer... < - >
: . . As a former TA, if you make me laugh you get § < -credit- > -6+6
: . . Where is your pic? § < zorpoid >
: . . Nope, for openers X isn't lost, it is in plain < RobertReport > +11
: . . : . . The proper question is: SOLVE for X ! § < - >
: . . : . . : . . And yet, it's still not an English test. § < --- > -1
: . . : . . : . . : . . Words have meaning! < Seriously-just-sthu! >
: . . : . . : . . That's a command not a question. < RogerInHawaii > -5
: . . : . . : . . : . . The student and you get an F! < - >
: . . : . . : . . : . . : . . Whoosh! Right over your head. < RogerInHawaii > -5+3
: . . Everybody likes a little. Nobody like a smart. § < tarragon_man >
--- I have a small lump only leg < - > -1
: . . What's a "lump only leg"? < RogerInHawaii >
: . . : . . Perhaps "lump on my leg"? < --- > +3
: . . : . . : . . how is that logically absurd? Seems perfectly § < plausible_ >
: . . : . . : . . You were a class clown, werentcha? § < dumb-shit >
: . . One time, at band camp... § < - > +7
: . . If it disappears, it's all good § < - >
: . . : . . Yes! § < LaurenMiller >
: . . : . . : . . Yoiks! < RogerInHawaii >
: . . : . . : . . : . . Go away you neanderthal. § < LaurenMiller >
: . . : . . : . . : . . : . . 71% that's a record § < going-for-100? >
: . . : . . : . . : . . : . . Neanderthal? < RogerInHawaii >
: . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . I've read your past posts on here.. < LaurenMiller >
: . . Sometimes a vein or valve in a vein will get < WonderWheeler > +6
: . . : . . look up phlebitis and thrombophlebitis. § < WonderWheeler >
: . . carbuncle? contusion? < its-gone >
--- what is the answer < - > -2
: . . It already set the fo ablaze last month < yetanothertroll > -5 링크
: . . : . . oh, okay. I really think that you need < - >
: . . : . . : . . I meant to type "the 8 and 2." § < - >
: . . : . . : . . : . . It is ambiguous. When in doubt, parenthesize. § < yetanothertroll > -5
: . . It is 16. < -sweet-16- > -6+7
: . . : . . "left to right" < NewMsLoree > -10+5
: . . : . . : . . Order of operations... para first! Always! < Seriously-just-sthu! > -23+15
: . . : . . : . . : . . If you do the multiplication first it's 1 § < - > -1
: . . : . . : . . : . . : . . Re-read it stupid! Inside parentheses first! < Holy-shit- > -19+10
: . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . okay I'll go slower for you < - > -5
: . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . P=p-a-r-e-n-t-h-e-s-e-s < Seriously-just-stfu! > -18+10
: . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . whoosh! § < - > -1
: . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . Yep! Went right past you. Enjoy § < your-failure-in-life > -17+5
: . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . Listen, you illiterate bumpkin, so far you < haven^t-earned-the- > -1+2
: . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . Well, I posted the ops order direct from < Seriously-just-sthu! > -8+9
: . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . Come back when you've finished High School. § < - >
: . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . That was decades ago, MS & P.H.D. later § < - >
: . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . What is a P.H.D.? < invivoVibrio > -5
: . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . Push Here Dummy? § < AZ_Dude > -5
: . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . It was a typo, stupid. < Seriously-just-sthu! >
: . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . Pretentious Hydrocephalic Dipshit? § < - > -5
: . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . Piled High and Deeper. § < WonderWheeler > -1
: . . : . . : . . : . . but, is 2a handled the same as 2*a? < - > -2+2 링크
: . . : . . : . . : . . : . . This is hilarious, though: < - > -1 링크
: . . : . . : . . I understand what you are saying however < kenguy119 >
: . . : . . : . . : . . You can't tell how long the original is < NewMsLoree > -1
: . . : . . : . . : . . : . . Yes, but doesn't < --- >
: . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . no § < NewMsLoree > -1
: . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . lol just lol § < kenguy119 > -3
: . . : . . : . . You're changing the equation. § < - > -5
: . . : . . : . . : . . The point doesn't seem to stick < NewMsLoree > -2+5
: . . : . . : . . : . . : . . The equation is written as: < -0- >
: . . : . . : . . : . . : . . There are 2 ways; the right and the wrong way! < - >
: . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . I withdraw my objection. 16 is right < NewMsLoree >
: . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . Very well. § < Carry-on- >
: . . : . . Correct! § < - > +3
: . . What's 1/2π ? < - >
: . . : . . Half as much pie! § < - >
: . . : . . Ninety degrees § < Henry_Blythe >
: . . : . . Lunch. § < Glibbons >
: . . I think it can be interpreted either way < RobertReport > +10
: . . : . . I like this answer best. § < - >
: . . : . . You cannot just add parentheses! < Because-you-wanna! > -6+8
: . . : . . : . . enjoy your narcissistic personality disorder! § < - > -5
: . . : . . : . . : . . Problem is..... they are correct < - > +2
: . . : . . There is no iffy here < -- > +4
: . . It's 16 § < this-is-not-hard > +4
: . . As written, the answer is 16 < AZ_Dude > +15
: . . : . . Yes, by modern convention there is a correct < NewMsLoree > 링크
: . . TI-84 says 16 < -0- > +5
: . . = ? < - > 사진
: . . 1 § < northcoaster > -2+5
--- I'm not the engineer, etc. that designed < the--------------------- >
: . . Maybe ask them at Eurocopter? < DreadPirateRobertz > +1
: . . I think this is a safety measure in passenger < - > +2
: . . I invented the Grujulopitalobine process § < - >
--- Cleaning house at the Media Lab < How_Green_Is_That > -8+5 링크
: . . That would be trying to clean the < HoneyBadger > +2
: . . plus all the Epstein stuff at MIT < peter303 > -1
mod "Secret" Vacuum Plasma Powered TicTac Vehicles! < WonderWheeler > -1 링크
: . . Salvatore Pais of MD seems to be < WonderWheeler > -1
: . . : . . It is possible that research is being pushed < WonderWheeler > -1 링크
: . . Why would they patent something like this? < aikixtal >
: . . : . . To get the Chinese and Russians to waste < NewMsLoree > +2
: . . : . . : . . But if this old fat lady doesn't believe it, < aikixtal > +2
: . . : . . a couple ideas < WonderWheeler > -3
: . . sounds like the name of a 60s rock band. § < coelentrate > +5
: . . if it's 'inertialess' then how is it visible? < - >
: . . : . . I don't pretend to understand how they justify < WonderWheeler >
: . . patent application story < oldgas > +5 링크
: . . Lots of patented ideas that don't actually work < AZ_Dude >
: . . : . . The video from the jets seem to verify that < WonderWheeler >
: . . : . . : . . Just saying a Patent doesn't prove diddly squat < AZ_Dude > +1
: . . : . . : . . : . . No. It also has to be unique and have some < WonderWheeler >
: . . : . . : . . : . . : . . I studied patents and copyrights in the past, < WonderWheeler >
: . . : . . : . . : . . : . . So you are saying all of the over-unity patents < AZ_Dude > +3 링크
: . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . To tell you the truth I have not studied those. < WonderWheeler >
: . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . Another witness video out today < WonderWheeler > 링크
: . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . AZ is correct. A patent gives you rights < pwt > -1+5
--- When ancient and Medieval architects/builders < ByronHenry > -13
: . . Hm... That's a kinda nebulous question. < Glibbons >
: . . When you consider how skilled the Romans were in < crotalus > +3 링크
: . . : . . ^^Modern sudies and computer models show the < UncleRoss > -5+8
: . . : . . : . . Thanks to the Islamic Jihadis helping to < snake9999 > -8
: . . : . . : . . : . . Takes two to tango. § < aikixtal >
: . . : . . : . . The first venue to be built < ByronHenry >
: . . Where to begin to address the ignorance of < pwt > +3
--- Tesla Free Energy from heat and magnets! < yetanothertroll > -5 링크
: . . Turn heat into energy? < crippled >
: . . : . . Ya beat me to it! § < pwt >
--- International Date Line < - > -6
: . . It's just where the time zone flips from +12 to < yetanothertroll > -5+3
: . . What you lose crossing the date line you gain < crotalus >
: . . : . . If you're 75 miles from the North Pole < - >
: . . "What's a nice girl like you doing in... < uno_hu >
--- I have a question. What do you call it when < Naturaly2_71 > +2
: . . Endothermic? § < NewMsLoree > +7
: . . As NML has pointed out, you mean exo- and < Barleycorn > +7 링크
: . . : . . I think but it’s s bit more complex. § < Naturaly2_71 >
: . . : . . : . . It was hard to tell exactly how to respond... § < Barleycorn >
: . . : . . : . . : . . Yea I’m having trouble expressing it. Sorry.If I < Naturaly2_71 >
: . . : . . : . . : . . : . . Perhaps you could give an example? § < pwt >
: . . Constant temperature is one such animal. < RobertReport > +5
: . . : . . Well, that might be it. photosynthesis is the < Naturaly2_71 >
--- Rainbow Chemtrails over Australia < - > -5+8 링크
: . . Gayliens? § < Glibbons > +10
: . . : . . Naw, just a bunch of gay people on the plane! § < RobertReport > -3
: . . LOL § < - >
: . . What a queer posting < - > 사진
: . . Water sprinklers too. < --- > +2 링크
: . . : . . That something Boots something < aikixtal > 링크
: . . It'll cause kangaroos and koalas to become gay. § < crotalus >
: . . : . . Why not? The drop bears shouldn't get < aikixtal >
: . . okay, wow. now I actually believe in cumtrails § < manlydan > -1
--- Paper quality < ByronHenry > -4
: . . Start cheap and work your way up < - >
: . . I would advise consulting a professional. < Glibbons >
: . . 20 lb is light < criticex > -2
: . . : . . Just to clarify < qajaq > +5
: . . : . . : . . yeah, it should say "bond" which is 17x22 § < criticex > -2+2
: . . : . . I agee, 24# with a high opacity might do the < trick_ >
: . . : . . I'm making a copy of A Christmas Carol < ByronHenry > -3
: . . : . . : . . Look into a FedEx or UPS online print job. They < Barleycorn >
: . . : . . Ordinary copy paper is 20 pound in thickness. < WonderWheeler >
: . . At school, theses were printed on 100% cotton < --- >
: . . Are you planning on printing just ONE book? < RogerInHawaii >
: . . : . . inkjets are deadly, laser printing can work if < - >
: . . : . . It's Dickens. I don't know yet, but < ByronHenry > -5
: . . : . . : . . It was the best of times, it was the wurst of § < times- >
: . . : . . : . . So you're printing a copy of a Dickens book < RogerInHawaii > -5+5
: . . : . . : . . : . . You think HPL would be a better bet? § < yetanothertroll > -5
: . . : . . : . . : . . : . . I don't think that printing out a book < RogerInHawaii >
: . . : . . : . . Have you looked into copyright law, & how you < Barleycorn >
: . . : . . : . . : . . They might be public domain by now. < yetanothertroll > -5+2 링크
: . . : . . : . . : . . : . . Dickens works ARE public domain. § < RogerInHawaii > -1+5
: . . You might find ... < zorpoid > 링크
: . . sounds like a printer malfunction < uno_hu >
mad Electrophoresis: Why constant amps or volts? < coelentrate >
: . . I do not know but it would seem that < RobertReport >
: . . There are a few things going on. < invivoVibrio > -5
: . . : . . Apparently I am exactly wrong. < invivoVibrio > -5+10 링크
: . . : . . : . . Thanks! Ive usually been taught about whats.... < coelentrate >
: . . : . . : . . Follow up question < coelentrate >
: . . : . . : . . : . . My guess would be < invivoVibrio > -5+5 링크
: . . : . . : . . : . . Ignore I.V. < - > -5+2
: . . : . . Doesn't heat generally *increase* resistance? § < Glibbons >
: . . : . . : . . Not for salt water < invivoVibrio > -5+5 링크
: . . isoelectric focusing § < - >
--- Global warming causes - pie chart - recent? < - > -2 사진
: . . I don't see sun or clouds on there , < dogmantra >
: . . : . . Solar input has been declining, < ConradNomikos > -1
: . . : . . : . . That you're wrong. § < Barleycorn > -1
: . . : . . : . . : . . Gee, try this on for size < ConradNomikos > -2+5 링크
: . . : . . : . . : . . : . . You cretin. A "cycle" implies BOTH decline & < Barleycorn >
: . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . So you don't have anything < ConradNomikos > -1
: . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . Lie if you want. It's your veracity in question. § < Barleycorn >
: . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . You definitely don't have anything < ConradNomikos > -2
: . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . Milankovitch cycles are seasonal not climatory < Barleycorn > 링크
: . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . : . . I don't know what's more pathetic < ConradNomikos >
: . . : . . : . . I didn't say one way or the other , < dogmantra >
: . . : . . : . . : . . Actually you did say that, < ConradNomikos >
: . . : . . : . . : . . : . . Still , don't expect govt. to solve problems < dogmantra >
: . . Ask the programmer of the software simulation < Deniersockpuppet > -6
: . . This chart ignores other important factors < DreadPirateRobertz > 링크
: . . : . . That's crazy! You imply we should be pumping < WonderWheeler > +5
: . . : . . : . . considering nuclear winter is another option < - >
: . . : . . : . . : . . If you are a fish, acid rain could be death. § < WonderWheeler >
--- SCRABBLE math? < - > 사진
: . . Depends upon how you play it! < Hit-triple-score >
|<< 최신 2019-09-28 20:37 가장 오래된 >>|
새 스레드 작성 응답 확인